In Re Bradley
1982.NC.40944; 57 N.C. APP. 475; 291 S.E.2D 800
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
In his first two arguments for reversal, respondent contends that G.S. ? 7A-289.32(4) violates the due process clause of the United States Constitution in that it invades "constitutionally protected parental rights by means which are not the least drastic" and in that it "is overbroad." These two assignments of error are purportedly based on Exception 9, which is to the conclusion of law