In Re C.E.K.
214 S.W.3D 492, 2006.TX.0009658
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Candace Keith (Mother) appeals the trial courts judgment terminating her parental rights to her two sons, C.E.K. and C.D.K. In eight issues, she contends the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support a finding that (1) Mother knowingly placed or allowed the children to remain in conditions that endangered them, (2) she engaged in conduct or knowingly placed the children with a person who engaged in conduct that endangered them, or (3) termination of her parental rights was in the childrens best interest; the trial court erred in admitting certain testimony; and it was error to terminate Mothers parental rights, as the trial court had discretion to preserve her rights and still safeguard the best interest of the children. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the decree of termination and dismiss the suit affecting the parent-child relationship.