In Re C.L.D. In Re C.L.D.

In Re C.L.D‪.‬

739 A.2D 353, 1999.DC.0042217

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrição da editora

Riverside Hospital ("Riverside") challenges a decision by the District of Columbia Department of Health ("the Department") which had the effect of retroactively denying Medicaid coverage to 53 of Riversides former patients. After the Departments Office of Fair Hearings ("OFH") had ruled in Riversides favor, the Director of the Department, in an administrative appeal, ruled that the OFH had no jurisdiction to consider Riversides claims. Before this court Riverside contends (1) that the OFH, not the District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review ("BAR"), as the Department contends, has jurisdiction to review Medicaid coverage disputes; (2) that Riverside has the authority to argue on behalf of those Medicaid recipients who received care that was considered not to be "medically necessary"; and (3) that the Departments failure to define the term "medically necessary" in accordance with the District of Columbia Administrative Procedure Act ("DCAPA") renders the disputed Medicaid coverage determinations invalid. Accordingly, Riverside asks this court to hold that the coverage determinations at issue are invalid and that the Department should be precluded from taking any further action based on those decisions.

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
1999
28 de outubro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
11
EDITORA
LawApp Publishers
TAMANHO
51
KB

Mais livros de District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

In re S.L.E In re S.L.E
1996
Council of District of Columbia v. Clay Council of District of Columbia v. Clay
1996
Kelly v. District Columbia Kelly v. District Columbia
1954
Price v. Derrickson Et Al. Price v. Derrickson Et Al.
1952
Peyton v. District Columbia Peyton v. District Columbia
1953
Mcdermett v. United States Mcdermett v. United States
1953