In Re Cheyenne M.R‪.‬

1 Mabel R. appeals from Child in Need of Protective Services (CHIPS) dispositional orders placing three of her children, Cheyenne R., Christopher R. and Tracey R. in the care of their older sister.Mabel contends that the evidence does not support findings that the children are in need of protective services, and that placement out of the home violates her constitutional right to rear her own children. Because the evidence supports the findings that Cheyenne, Christopher and Tracey are in need of protective services, and because the constitutional claim is without merit, we affirm.