In Re Compensation of Noble In Re Compensation of Noble

In Re Compensation of Noble

221 P.3D 180, 232 OR.APP. 93, 2009.OR.0000932

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrição da editora

While walking to a credit union to deposit a personal check during a paid break from work, claimant slipped on ice and fractured her right ankle. The Workers Compensation Board (the board) determined that, because claimants errand was not a recreational or social activity performed primarily for her personal pleasure, and because claimants employer controlled the parking lot where the fall occurred, the injury was sufficiently work-related to be compensable. Legacy Health Systems, the self-insured employer, seeks judicial review. We agree that claimants injury did not occur during a social or recreational activity and that it occurred "in the course of" employment, but, because the board failed to determine whether the injury arose "out of" claimants employment, we reverse and remand.

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
2009
18 de novembro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
9
EDITORA
LawApp Publishers
TAMANHO
60,6
KB

Mais livros de In the Supreme Court of Tennessee at Knoxville

Dellinger v. State Dellinger v. State
2009
Willamette Oaks Willamette Oaks
2009
State v. Heisser State v. Heisser
2009
Alexander v. Armentrout Alexander v. Armentrout
2000
Frizzell Construction Co. Frizzell Construction Co.
1999
Stephenson v. Carlton Stephenson v. Carlton
2000