In Re Dow Corning Corp.
419 F.3D 543, 2005 FED.APP. 0360P, 45 BANKR.CT.DEC. 46, 2005.C06.0001097
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Twenty-seven Texas plaintiffs seeking recovery for injuries resulting from allegedly faulty breast implants engaged in settlement negotiations with the implants manufacturer, Dow Corning Corp., a Michigan company. After the discussions reached an impasse over terms covering the consequences in the event settlement payments were not timely, Dow Corning suggested a clause requiring payments of $100 per day to each plaintiff for any time during which settlement payments were late. The plaintiffs agreed to this clause, and entered into the settlement agreement, later selling their right to settlement payments to Appellant Bear Stearns. When Dow Corning declared bankruptcy and began to miss payments under the settlement agreement, Bear Stearns attempted to enforce the clause via a bankruptcy claim. The district court, on Dow Cornings motion for summary judgment, held that the clause was a penalty unenforceable under Texas law, and also found that a condition precedent to the contractual provision of liquidated damages had not been met. Bear Stearns now appeals, arguing that the condition precedent was in fact met, and that Dow Corning should be estopped from asserting that the clause is a penalty. Because the clause is a penalty unenforceable under Texas law, and because Texas courts preclude parties from being estopped from asserting an illegality defense, we AFFIRM the decision below.