In Re Estate of Palmen
588 N.W.2D 493, 1999.MN.42099
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Having been convicted of being an ineligible person in possession of a firearm, appellant contends that the district court abused its discretion in allowing Spreigl evidence of a prior conviction of the same crime and an incriminating photograph taken at another time. He also contends that his right to a speedy trial was violated. Because the court improperly allowed the Spreigl evidence, we reverse and remand on that issue, but we find no violation of appellant‟s right to a speedy trial.