Jensen v. State

The following memorandum was filed December 22, 1967. Per Curiam (on motion for rehearing). Defendant urges that, inasmuch as prejudicial error was found with respect to two of the three counts as to which he was convicted, we should reverse those two convictions. It is claimed that the affirmance of those two convictions might adversely affect action by the parole board with respect to future applications for parole or pardon. This court by independent investigation has verified that this might occur. With respect to this being a valid ground for setting aside such two convictions see State ex rel. Goodchild v. Burke (1965), 27 Wis. 2d 244, 251, 252, 133 N.W.2d 753. Therefore, the mandate should be revised so as to provide for the setting aside of these two convictions leaving stand that with respect to the count relating to the April 24, 1963, conviction.