Jimenez v. Shop Rite Foods Inc‪.‬

Trial of the case before a jury resulted in a verdict for plaintiff. Judgment was entered thereon. Defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for a new trial. The motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was sustained. In the order granting judgment n. o. v. the court found "that the court erroneously admitted testimony into evidence of a prior fall at defendants store; that under any circumstances there was insufficient evidence of defendants negligence to raise a question of fact for the jury * * *."