![Jiminez v. Rice](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Jiminez v. Rice](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Jiminez v. Rice
276 F.3d 478, 2001.C09.0000869 , 1 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10,727, 2001 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,388
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Sebastian H. Jiminez appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994 & Supp. II 1996) petition. Because Jiminez did not exhaust state remedies before filing his federal habeas petition, the district court granted Warden Bertram Rices motion to dismiss. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Supp. II 1996), and we affirm.