![Jimmy Carl Haggerty v. State Texas](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Jimmy Carl Haggerty v. State Texas](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Jimmy Carl Haggerty v. State Texas
1973.TX.40541 491 S.W.2D 916
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Appellant first complains of a non-responsive answer of a States witness. Appellant objected and requested an instruction to the jury to disregard the answer. Then, without securing a ruling on either his objection or his requested instruction, he quickly moved for a mistrial. Appellants failure to pursue his request for an instruction to a ruling did not properly preserve the ground for review. A prompt instruction to disregard an unresponsive answer is usually sufficient to cure error, if any. Noble v. State, 402 S.W.2d 758.