![Johnny Pierce Cooper v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Johnny Pierce Cooper v. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Johnny Pierce Cooper v. State
1956.TX.40440; 288 S.W.2D 762, 162 TEX. CRIM. 624
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
The so-called Texas rule stated in 12 Tex. Jur. p. 309, Sec. 63, is supported by the case of Davis v. State, 70 Tex. Crim. 524, 158 S.W. 288, where this court declined to recognize entrapment as a defense to the offense of offering to bribe an assistant county attorney.