![Johnson v. Bell](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Johnson v. Bell](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Johnson v. Bell
NC.40036; 67 S.E.2d 658; 234 N.C. 522 (1951)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
[234 NC Page 526] Did the trial court err in overruling motions of defendant, aptly made, for judgment as in case of nonsuit? In the light of the provisions of G.S. 20-158 applied to the allegations of the complaint, and the evidence offered by plaintiff which tends to show that Clark Avenue is a through or dominant street, and Woodburn Road is subservient thereto, it would seem that the case was one for the jury. See Anderson v. Office Supplies, ante, 142.