![Johnson v. Bismarck Public School District](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Johnson v. Bismarck Public School District](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Johnson v. Bismarck Public School District
1991.C08.40148 ; 949 F.2D 1000
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Ronald Erdman appeals from his conviction for harboring or concealing a fugitive in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1071 (1988). Erdman argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. He also argues that the trial court erred in its definition of "harboring or concealing," in its handling of a jury request for transcripts of parts of the trial testimony, and in its admission of purely speculative evidence. We affirm the conviction. Because we find Erdmans other claims meritless, we discuss only the sufficiency of the evidence claim.