Mack Halladay and Merle Halladay v. Madge Mack Halladay and Merle Halladay v. Madge

Mack Halladay and Merle Halladay v. Madge

1984.UT.105, 685 P.2D 500

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrição da editora

OAKS, Justice: This is an appeal from a judgment relying on boundary by acquiescence to quiet title to a 52.5-by 118-foot parcel of real property in the city of Provo. The issues are whether a showing of uncertainty or dispute on the location of a boundary line is necessary to the application of boundary by acquiescence, and, if so, what is meant by "uncertainty" and who has the burden of proving it.

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
1984
1 de maio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
36
EDITORA
LawApp Publishers
TAMANHO
77,7
KB

Mais livros de Court of Appeals of Utah

State Utah v. Michael Squire State Utah v. Michael Squire
1994
Margot De Villiers v. Utah County Margot De Villiers v. Utah County
1994
Carl W. Barney v. Utah Department Commerce Carl W. Barney v. Utah Department Commerce
1994
State Utah v. Richard Perry State Utah v. Richard Perry
1994
Jack A. and Bonnie J. Lassche v. Utah Jack A. and Bonnie J. Lassche v. Utah
1993
Paul Billings Dba Billings Drilling Paul Billings Dba Billings Drilling
1987