Manhattan (1961 "Vast Wasteland" Speech by Newton Minow) Manhattan (1961 "Vast Wasteland" Speech by Newton Minow)

Manhattan (1961 "Vast Wasteland" Speech by Newton Minow‪)‬

Federal Communications Law Journal 2003, May, 55, 3

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Descrição da editora

WHAT'S THE PROBLEM? There is a remarkable difference between television in 1961, when Newton Minow delivered his great "Vast Wasteland" speech, (1) and television in the current era. The difference is the increase in the number of channels. When Minow spoke, most Americans only had access to three or four stations. The big networks monopolized the system. In the modern era, most Americans have cable television, and this means that most Americans have access to about 100 or more stations. Indeed, many Americans have access to DIRECTV, which means that they have access to more than 500 stations. No one knows what innovations the future will bring, but it is clear that scarcity is a decreasing problem. Let us suppose, plausibly, that for the overwhelming majority of Americans, television will contain an extraordinarily wide range of options in the near future.

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
2003
1 de maio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
13
EDITORA
Federal Communications Law Journal
TAMANHO
249,5
KB

Mais livros de Federal Communications Law Journal

Securing the Freedom of the Communications Revolution (Introduction) Securing the Freedom of the Communications Revolution (Introduction)
2005
Spectrum Wars: The Policy and Technology Debate  (Book Review) Spectrum Wars: The Policy and Technology Debate  (Book Review)
2004
The Two-Step Evidentiary and Causation Quandary for Medium-Specific Laws Targeting Sexual and Violent Content: First Proving Harm and Injury to Silence Speech, Then Proving Redress and Rehabilitation Through Censorship. The Two-Step Evidentiary and Causation Quandary for Medium-Specific Laws Targeting Sexual and Violent Content: First Proving Harm and Injury to Silence Speech, Then Proving Redress and Rehabilitation Through Censorship.
2008
Television for All: Increasing Television Accessibility for the Visually Impaired Through the Fcc's Ability to Regulate Video Description Technology (Rough Consensus and Running Code: Integrating Engineering Principles Into the Internet Policy Debates) Television for All: Increasing Television Accessibility for the Visually Impaired Through the Fcc's Ability to Regulate Video Description Technology (Rough Consensus and Running Code: Integrating Engineering Principles Into the Internet Policy Debates)
2011
Access to Media All A-Twitter: Revisiting Gertz and the Access to Media Test in the Age of Social Networking. (Rough Consensus and Running Code: Integrating Engineering Principles Into the Internet Policy Debates) Access to Media All A-Twitter: Revisiting Gertz and the Access to Media Test in the Age of Social Networking. (Rough Consensus and Running Code: Integrating Engineering Principles Into the Internet Policy Debates)
2011
Restraining Amazon.Com's Orwellian Potential: The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act As Consumer Rights Legislation (Rough Consensus and Running Code: Integrating Engineering Principles Into the Internet Policy Debates) Restraining Amazon.Com's Orwellian Potential: The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act As Consumer Rights Legislation (Rough Consensus and Running Code: Integrating Engineering Principles Into the Internet Policy Debates)
2011