![Mariniello v. Shell Oil Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Mariniello v. Shell Oil Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Mariniello v. Shell Oil Co.
C03.40211; 511 F.2d 853 (1975)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Opinion OF THE COURT ADAMS, Circuit Judge. The issue for resolution is whether the decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court in Shell Oil Co. v. Marinello,1 which the plaintiff seeks to apply here, is violative of the United States Constitution. The district court determined that the New Jersey decision, which protected franchisees from termination without cause, subverted the purposes of the federal Lanham Act, and held that under the Supremacy Clause the state decision could not survive.2 We conclude that the Supremacy Clause was not violated, and remand.
More Books by United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Pennsylvania Protection and Advocacy, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
2005
Major League Umpires Association v. American League of Professional Baseball Clubs
2004
United States v. Lennon
2004
Egervary v. Young
2004
Josey v. John R. Hollingsworth Corp.
1993
Partnership v. Commercial Asset Trust I (Cat)
1993