N. and J. Dick and Company v. Hardin D. Runnels N. and J. Dick and Company v. Hardin D. Runnels

N. and J. Dick and Company v. Hardin D. Runnels

46 U.S. 7, 1847.SCT.0000022

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Recorder No. 1, Mayor pro tem.' And thereupon a motion was made by the defendant's counsel to exclude the deposition, on the ground 'that the commissioner taking said deposition did not certify, that neither the said defendant or his attorney was within one hundred miles of New Orleans, the place of taking the deposition, at the time of taking the same.' Upon which question the judges were opposed in opinion, which is ordered to be certified to the Supreme Court of the United States, which is done accordingly. Mr. Bibb, counsel for the defendant, submitted the case to the Court.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1847
1 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
4
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
63.9
KB

More Books by United States Supreme Court

The China The China
1868
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Evidence Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure and Appellate Procedure 2023 Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure and Appellate Procedure 2023
2023