![Oliver Machinery Co. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Oliver Machinery Co. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Oliver Machinery Co. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.
CA.40048; 187 Cal. App. 3d 1510; 232 Cal. Rptr. 691 (1986)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
[187 CalApp3d Page 1513] On cross-motions for summary judgment or adjudication of issues, the trial court determined as a matter of law United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G) has no duty to defend or indemnify Oliver Machinery Company (Oliver) in the underlying action under a vendor's broad form endorsement contained in a policy issued to Pal Industries, Inc. (Pal).