Pearson v. Shalala Pearson v. Shalala

Pearson v. Shalala

334 U.S.App.D.C. 71, 164 F.3d 650, CDC.42014(1999)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrição da editora

Argued December 1, 1998 Consolidated with 98-5084 Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge Silberman. Marketers of dietary supplements must, before including on their labels a claim characterizing the relationship of the supplement to a disease or health-related condition, submit the claim to the Food and Drug Administration for preapproval. The FDA authorizes a claim only if it finds ""significant scientific agreement"" among experts that the claim is supported by the available evidence. Appellants failed to persuade the FDA to authorize four such claims and sought relief in the district court, where their various constitutional and statutory challenges were rejected. We reverse.

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
1999
15 de janeiro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
28
EDITORA
LawApp Publishers
TAMANHO
67,3
KB

Mais livros de District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

United States v. Brown United States v. Brown
2003
Mcdonald Partners, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board Mcdonald Partners, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
2003
Aid Association for Lutherans v. United States Postal Service Aid Association for Lutherans v. United States Postal Service
2003
Building and Construction Trades Dept., Afl-Cio v. Allbaugh Building and Construction Trades Dept., Afl-Cio v. Allbaugh
2002
Costa De Oro Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission Costa De Oro Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
2002
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
2002