People State New York v. Philip Rahming

[26 N.Y.2d 411 Page 414] On defendant's appeal from a conviction for robbery two issues have been raised requiring a new trial and a new preliminary
identification hearing. The first relates to improper cross-examination of defendant by the prosecutor to elicit and then
contradict on rebuttal by extrinsic proof matter excludable because obtained in violation of the rules laid down in Miranda
v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436). The second relates to a suggestive lineup identification of defendant casting doubt upon the victim's
in-court identification.