![People State New York v. Richard Alfaro](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![People State New York v. Richard Alfaro](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
People State New York v. Richard Alfaro
NY.53556; 489 N.E.2d 1280; 66 N.Y.2d 985 (1985)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
The defendant's contention that the verdict is repugnant was not preserved at trial and therefore may not be considered on
appeal.
As a general rule alleged errors must be raised at a time when they can be corrected at trial. Thus in jury cases any claim
that the verdict is repugnant must be made before the jury is discharged (People v Satloff, 56 N.Y.2d 745; People v Stahl, 53 N.Y.2d 1048).