![People State New York v. Timothy L. Bell](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![People State New York v. Timothy L. Bell](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
People State New York v. Timothy L. Bell
NY.45347; 471 N.E.2d 137; 63 N.Y.2d 796 (1984)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Even if we accept defendant's contention that the proper test for admissibility of photographs of a victim being attended
in the hospital is a balancing of the inflammatory nature of the photographs against their materiality and relevance to the
prosecution's case, we find no abuse of discretion in the admission of the photographs here in question (but see People v
Pobliner, 32 N.