![People State New York v. Vernon Branch And Vraden Branch](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![People State New York v. Vernon Branch And Vraden Branch](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
People State New York v. Vernon Branch And Vraden Branch
1979.NY.42193 389 N.E.2D 467; 46 N.Y.2D 645
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
After a joint jury trial defendants Vernon and Vraden Branch were convicted of murder in the second degree (Penal Law, § 125.25, subd 3) and robbery in the first degree (Penal Law, § 160.15). On appeal to the Appellate Division both defendants argued, among other things, that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in denying their challenge for cause to excuse a venireman from the jury. The Appellate Division held that the denial of the challenge for cause constituted reversible error under CPL 270.20 (subd 1, par [c]), reversed the judgments of conviction and remanded for a new trial. This case presents a novel question of statutory interpretation.