Rochelle Aronoff Et Al. v. Texas Turnpike Authority Rochelle Aronoff Et Al. v. Texas Turnpike Authority

Rochelle Aronoff Et Al. v. Texas Turnpike Authority

1957.TX.40221; 299 S.W.2D 342

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrição da editora

In order for appellants to show that they were entitled to a jury trial notwithstanding their failure to pay the jury fee on time, it was necessary for them to negative both the conditions which might defeat their request. In other words, appellants had the burden of establishing that to allow them a jury trial (1) would not operate to injure the adverse party, and (2) would not disrupt the courts docket. On the other hand, to defeat appellants demand for a jury trial under the circumstances, appellee needed only to establish one -- either one -- of the conditions. That is to say, appellee had only to show that to allow appellants a jury trial would operate to injure appellee or would disrupt the courts docket. The record here shows that both conditions were negatived. Therefore appellants were entitled to a jury trial.

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
1957
15 de fevereiro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
2
EDITORA
LawApp Publishers
TAMANHO
62,5
KB

Mais livros de Dallas Court of Civil Appeals of Texas

Clesi Et Al. v. Northwest Dallas Imp. Assn Et Al. Clesi Et Al. v. Northwest Dallas Imp. Assn Et Al.
1953
Lee Atkins Et Al. v. Nettie Edna Womble Lee Atkins Et Al. v. Nettie Edna Womble
1957
Frank J. and erson v. Glen Hake Et Al. Frank J. and erson v. Glen Hake Et Al.
1957
William P. Wright v. Allstate Insurance Co. William P. Wright v. Allstate Insurance Co.
1956
Wallace v. Van Zandt County Wallace v. Van Zandt County
1954
Bernice Couch Et Vir v. City Richardson Et Al. Bernice Couch Et Vir v. City Richardson Et Al.
1958