Sas Institute

The trial court in this case granted SAS Institutes motion for summary judgment, requiring John Breitenfeld to repay a bonus on a cancelled sale based on a commission contract between the two parties. The court of appeals reversed and rendered judgment on Breitenfelds motion for summary judgment against SAS, allowing Breitenfeld to keep the bonus under the commission contract. We hold the contract language is unambiguous and Breitenfeld is required to pay back the bonus he received because the sale on which the bonus was based was cancelled. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals judgment and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.