![Sato v. Denburgh](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Sato v. Denburgh](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Sato v. Denburgh
599 P.2d 181, 123 Ariz. 225, 1979.AZ.40253
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Carl and Susie Sato appeal from a summary judgment entered against them and in favor of Robert P. Van Denburgh and three accounting firms with which he had been associated. We have jurisdiction of this appeal pursuant to Rule 19(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.