Scates v. United States Scates v. United States

Scates v. United States

C04.44036 (1990)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrição da editora

David Michael Scates appeals the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Scates sought to have expunged from his record a 1966 juvenile conviction for breaking and entering on a military reservation. It was his contention that his guilty plea was involuntary and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm. Coram nobis is an extraordinary remedy that is available only under circumstances compelling relief in order to achieve justice. United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 512-13 (1954). The burden is on the petitioner to show that he is entitled to relief; the challenged proceedings are presumed to be correct. Id. To meet his burden, a petitioner must show that a more usual remedy is unavailable; that valid reasons exist for not attacking his conviction earlier; that adverse consequences flow from the conviction so that there exists a case or controversy; and that the error is of the most fundamental character. Hirabayashi v. United States, 828 F.2d 591, 604 (9th Cir. 1987).

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
1990
21 de setembro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
2
EDITORA
LawApp Publishers
TAMANHO
52
KB

Mais livros de United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Allen v. Lee Allen v. Lee
2004
Ram v. Heckler Ram v. Heckler
1986
Chase Brexton Health Services, Incorporated v. State of Maryland Chase Brexton Health Services, Incorporated v. State of Maryland
2005
Turmon v. Jordan Turmon v. Jordan
2005
United States v. Pierce United States v. Pierce
2005
Discover Bank v. Vaden Discover Bank v. Vaden
2005