Tactics Characteristic of Sham Peer Review (Editorial)
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 2009, Fall, 14, 3
-
- 2,99 €
-
- 2,99 €
Descrição da editora
The tactics used by hospitals and others in conducting a sham peer review are remarkably similar throughout the country. The common feature of these tactics is that they violate due process and/or fundamental fairness, and they often represent an attempt to make the incident or event "fit the crime." Although our legal system is not perfect, it does incorporate sound principles and procedures designed to protect an accused individual's right to due process and fundamental fairness (e.g. an accused person is considered innocent until proven guilty). In evaluating the fairness of peer review, one can often find corresponding principles of due process and fundamental fairness in our legal system.
Mais livros de Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Selective Serotonin: Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) Drugs: More Risks Than Benefits?(Report)
2009
Physicians Beware: Medicare RAC Attacks Coming (Editorial) (Recovery Audit Contractor)
2009
A Short History of American Medicine, 1955- (From the President)
2008
On Law and Rights: Can the Center Hold?(Speech)
2009
Global Health Threats: Global Warming in Perspective (Report)
2009
The Need for Clinical Judgment in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lyme Disease (Report)
2009