The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999: a Bridge Too Far? Or Not Far Enough? The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999: a Bridge Too Far? Or Not Far Enough?

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999: a Bridge Too Far? Or Not Far Enough‪?‬

Suffolk University Law Review 2010, Fall, 43, 4

Suffolk University Law Review
    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Descrição da editora

I. INTRODUCTION The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) of 1999, also termed the Financial Modernization Act of 1999, was signed into law on November 12, 1999. (1) At the time of its enactment it was hailed by supporters as an important step forward in the removal of the legal barriers between commercial banking and investment banking in the United States--a step that would strengthen both sectors. (2)

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
2010
22 de setembro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
37
EDITORA
Suffolk University Law School
TAMANHO
267,6
KB

Mais livros de Suffolk University Law Review

Constitutional Law - Seventh Circuit Applies Ex Parte Young Doctrine to Allow State Agency's Action Against State Officials - Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services V. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration. Constitutional Law - Seventh Circuit Applies Ex Parte Young Doctrine to Allow State Agency's Action Against State Officials - Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services V. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration.
Constitutional Law - Seventh Circuit Applies Ex Parte Young Doctrine to Allow State Agency's Action Against State Officials - Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services V. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration.
2011
A Comment on the Rise and Fall of the Supreme People's Court's Reply to Qi Yuling's Case (Infringement Upon Qi's Right of Name and Right to Receive Education) (Symposium: Constitutional Review in the People's Republic of China) A Comment on the Rise and Fall of the Supreme People's Court's Reply to Qi Yuling's Case (Infringement Upon Qi's Right of Name and Right to Receive Education) (Symposium: Constitutional Review in the People's Republic of China)
A Comment on the Rise and Fall of the Supreme People's Court's Reply to Qi Yuling's Case (Infringement Upon Qi's Right of Name and Right to Receive Education) (Symposium: Constitutional Review in the People's Republic of China)
2010
Arbitration Law - Second Circuit Holds Section 7 of the Federal Arbitration Act Does Not Permit Arbitration Panels to Issue Prehearing Document Subpoenas to Nonparties - Life Receivables Trust V. Syndicate 102 at Lloyd's of London. Arbitration Law - Second Circuit Holds Section 7 of the Federal Arbitration Act Does Not Permit Arbitration Panels to Issue Prehearing Document Subpoenas to Nonparties - Life Receivables Trust V. Syndicate 102 at Lloyd's of London.
Arbitration Law - Second Circuit Holds Section 7 of the Federal Arbitration Act Does Not Permit Arbitration Panels to Issue Prehearing Document Subpoenas to Nonparties - Life Receivables Trust V. Syndicate 102 at Lloyd's of London.
2010
A Constitutional Court for China Within the Chinese Communist Party: Scientific Development and a Reconsideration of the Institutional Role of the CCP. (Symposium: Constitutional Review in the People's Republic of China) A Constitutional Court for China Within the Chinese Communist Party: Scientific Development and a Reconsideration of the Institutional Role of the CCP. (Symposium: Constitutional Review in the People's Republic of China)
A Constitutional Court for China Within the Chinese Communist Party: Scientific Development and a Reconsideration of the Institutional Role of the CCP. (Symposium: Constitutional Review in the People's Republic of China)
2010
My Dog Ate My Email: Creating a Comprehensive Adverse Inference Instruction Standard for Spoliation of Electronic Evidence. My Dog Ate My Email: Creating a Comprehensive Adverse Inference Instruction Standard for Spoliation of Electronic Evidence.
My Dog Ate My Email: Creating a Comprehensive Adverse Inference Instruction Standard for Spoliation of Electronic Evidence.
2009
The Frequency, Predictability, And Proportionality of Jury Awards of Punitive Damages in State Courts in 2005: a New Audit. The Frequency, Predictability, And Proportionality of Jury Awards of Punitive Damages in State Courts in 2005: a New Audit.
The Frequency, Predictability, And Proportionality of Jury Awards of Punitive Damages in State Courts in 2005: a New Audit.
2010