![[U] Anderson v. Anderson](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![[U] Anderson v. Anderson](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
[U] Anderson v. Anderson
766 N.W.2d 243, 316 Wis.2d 775, WI.0000105(2009)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Before Brown, C.J., Anderson, P.J., and Neubauer, J. 1 Brian Lee Anderson appeals from the order of the family court that denied his motion to reduce child support. Brian argues that the family court erred when it denied his motion because it did not adopt the statutory presumption that there has been a substantial change in circumstances after thirty-three months. WIS. STAT.§ 767.59(1f)(b)2 (2005-06).1 We conclude that the family court properly exercised its discretion and did not err as a matter of law. Consequently, we summarily affirm the order of the family court. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21.