![[U] Niederle v. T.D. Escrow Service](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![[U] Niederle v. T.D. Escrow Service](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
[U] Niederle v. T.D. Escrow Service
114 WASH.APP. 1046, 2002.WA.0001698
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
eliminated the interest held in the same property by appellant Niederle, a purchaser of a second-position deed of trust. The property was registered land under Washingtons Torrens Act, Chapter 65.12 RCW. Niederle contends the foreclosure sale at which he purchased his second-position interest was invalid because the trustee, having given notice as required by the Deed of Trust Act, did not also file notice of the sale with the Torrens registrar. Because filing such a notice is not required to make the trustees deed effective as a conveyance, we affirm the order dismissing Niederles claim against the trustee.