![[U] Pacific Reliance, Inc. v. Transmoreproduct, Inc.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![[U] Pacific Reliance, Inc. v. Transmoreproduct, Inc.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
[U] Pacific Reliance, Inc. v. Transmoreproduct, Inc.
128 WASH.APP. 1007, 2005.WA.0000959
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
An arbitration award may only be vacated where the award was either procured by corruption, fraud, or other undue means or on other limited grounds that are not at issue here. A trial court does not abuse its discretion in refusing to vacate an award where the notice to arbitrate substantially complied with the terms of the contract and the award was not procured by undue means. Because the notice to arbitrate complied with the contract and governing law and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to vacate, we affirm.