Yitzhari v. Yitzhari
906 SO.2D 1250, 30 FLA. L. WEEKLY D1791, 2005.FL.0003580
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Russell Johnson appeals from the revocation of his probation, contending that the evidence presented by the State was legally insufficient to support a finding that he had willfully and substantially violated his probation. The trial court found that Johnson had violated his probation by committing new law offenses. Because the only evidence linking Johnson to the alleged new offenses was hearsay, we reverse and remand for Johnson to be reinstated to probation.