In Re H.D.H. In Re H.D.H.

In Re H.D.H‪.‬

127 S.W.3d 921, 2004.TX.0001168

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

After a jury found that the parental rights of Christopher Horton should be terminated, the trial court entered its order terminating the parent-child relationships between appellant and his two children, H.D.H. and C.M.H. Pursuant to section 263.405 of the Texas Family Code, appellant filed his sworn statement of indigency, motion for new trial, and statement of appellate points. The trial court found appellant was indigent, and appellee, the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services ("Department"), does not contest that determination. The trial court further denied appellants motion for new trial, and found: (1) appellant presented no substantial question for appellate review and (2) the appeal was frivolous. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 263.405(g) (Vernon 2002); see Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 13.003 (Vernon 2002). In accordance with the statute, this court has reviewed the parties briefs and limited appellate record. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 263.405(g) (Vernon 2002). We overrule and vacate the trial courts order of September 3, 2003.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2004
12 de febrero
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
5
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
50.7
KB
Gaspard v. Dupont Dow Elastomers Gaspard v. Dupont Dow Elastomers
2004
Franks v. Woodville Independent School District Franks v. Woodville Independent School District
2004
In re K.C In re K.C
2000
Thomas v. White Thomas v. White
2003
Cash v. Beaumont Dealers Auto Auction Cash v. Beaumont Dealers Auto Auction
2009
Klein & Associates Political Relations v. Port Arthur Independent School District Klein & Associates Political Relations v. Port Arthur Independent School District
2002