M.O.S. Corporation v. John I. Haas Co. M.O.S. Corporation v. John I. Haas Co.

M.O.S. Corporation v. John I. Haas Co‪.‬

C09.125 , 375 F.2d 614 (1967)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge: Appellant, the holder of the patent in suit, appeals from a judgment in favor of appellee in an action for infringement. This is the second appeal in this case. In M.O.S. Corp. v. John I. Haas Co., 9 Cir., 1964, 332 F.2d 910, we reversed a judgment in favor of appellee. We held that it was error for the trial court to apply the doctrine of file wrapper estoppel in deciding that the patent was not infringed. We did not rule on the validity of the patent. Upon remand, the trial court received additional evidence. It again found that the patent was not infringed, but did not pass upon its validity, although that question was expressly raised by appellee, was stated as an issue in the amended pretrial order, and was litigated. On the present appeal, we affirm, but on the ground that the patent is invalid, rather than that appellee did not infringe.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1967
21 de marzo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
17
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
72.1
KB

Más libros de United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Buono v. Norton Buono v. Norton
2004
United States v. Navidad-Marcos United States v. Navidad-Marcos
2004
United States v. Joyce United States v. Joyce
2004
In re Marshall In re Marshall
2004
Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation Jones v. E*Trade Mortgage Corporation
2005
Dees v. Billy Dees v. Billy
2005