People v. Martin People v. Martin

People v. Martin

25 CAL.4TH 1180, 25 P.3D 1081, 108 CAL.RPTR.2D 599, 2001.CA.0000500, 1 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 5556, 2001 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 6843

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

In People v. Mijares (1971) 6 Cal.3d 415 (Mijares), this court held that, under limited circumstances, momentary or transitory possession of an unlawful narcotic for the sole purpose of disposing of it can constitute a defense to a charge of criminal possession of the controlled substance. (Id. at p. 419.) Nearly two decades later, the court in People v. Cole (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 1439 (Cole) read our decision in Mijares as holding that "possession of illegal drugs solely for the purpose of disposal does not constitute unlawful possession," and further concluded the defense "is not limited to possession for `brief moments only." (Id. at p. 1445, italics in orig.)

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2001
2 de julio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
24
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
69
KB
Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver
2001
In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction
2001
People v. Doherty People v. Doherty
1996
People v. Woodrum People v. Woodrum
1996
In re Title In re Title
1996
People v. Bauder People v. Bauder
1997