Decision No. 2-3/PUU-V/2007 (2007) (Indonesian Constitutional Court) (Human Rights) Decision No. 2-3/PUU-V/2007 (2007) (Indonesian Constitutional Court) (Human Rights)

Decision No. 2-3/PUU-V/2007 (2007) (Indonesian Constitutional Court) (Human Rights‪)‬

Australian International Law Journal 2007, Annual, 14

    • 14,99 lei
    • 14,99 lei

Publisher Description

Introduction After the fall of President Suharto's authoritarian 'New Order' regime in 1998, Indonesia's legal and political systems underwent a seismic process of reform (the 'reformasi eta') (1) In less than four years, the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia ('Constitution') (2) was amended no less than for four times, including the introduction of a set of human rights clauses in chapter XA that transformed Indonesia's disparate constitutional human rights protections into a comprehensive human rights framework. (3) The introduction of a constitutional human rights regime placed Indonesia in a somewhat unique and visionary position in a region that has been internationally notorious for its suspicion of 'Western' style rights regimes and where few countries have committed to either the core international human rights conventions or comprehensive internal human rights laws. (4) As a consequence, the work of Indonesia's fledgling Constitutional Court has been, and will continue to be, of interest to many within the region as a body of human rights jurisprudence offering unique insights into the ways in which human rights may be interpreted and applied within the Asia Pacific and Southeast Asian contexts.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2007
1 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
21
Pages
PUBLISHER
University of Western Sydney, School of Law
SIZE
274.5
KB

More Books by Australian International Law Journal

Victim Participation at the International Criminal Court. Victim Participation at the International Criminal Court.
2009
The Genocide Convention Case: Confusion Or Clarity? Case Concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina V. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment of 26 February 2007, General List No. 91. The Genocide Convention Case: Confusion Or Clarity? Case Concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina V. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment of 26 February 2007, General List No. 91.
2007
Secondary Forms of Genocide and Command Responsibility Under the Statutes of the ICTY, ICTR and ICC. (International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, International Criminal Court) Secondary Forms of Genocide and Command Responsibility Under the Statutes of the ICTY, ICTR and ICC. (International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, International Criminal Court)
2010
Case Concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina V. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment of 26 February 2007, General List No. 91. Case Concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina V. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment of 26 February 2007, General List No. 91.
2007
Financing Adaptation in Pacific Island Countries: Prospects for the Post-2012 Climate Change Regime. Financing Adaptation in Pacific Island Countries: Prospects for the Post-2012 Climate Change Regime.
2007
Prosecutor V. Boskoski. (Terrorist Activities) Prosecutor V. Boskoski. (Terrorist Activities)
2009