Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Laflin & Laflin Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Laflin & Laflin

Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Laflin & Laflin

1979.CA.41090 89 CAL. APP. 3D 651; 152 CAL. RPTR. 800

    • 5,00 kr
    • 5,00 kr

Utgivarens beskrivning

Defendants George Anthony Hadzima, Jr., Donald James Newell, and William Edward Donohue pleaded guilty to several counts of burglary following the superior courts denial of their Penal Code section 1538.5 motion to suppress evidence essential to their successful prosecution, and which led to their arrests and guilty pleas. Hadzima appeals from a judgment under which he was sentenced to state prison. Newell and Donohue, jointly represented by other counsel, appeal from orders granting probation conditioned upon six months of county jail confinement. We have consolidated the appeals for hearing and determination.

GENRE
Yrkesrelaterat och teknik
UTGIVEN
1979
23 februari
SPRÅK
EN
Engelska
LÄNGD
61
Sidor
UTGIVARE
LawApp Publishers
STORLEK
98,8
KB

Fler böcker av Fourth Appellate District, Division Two Court of Appeal of California

Williams v. Braslow Williams v. Braslow
1986
Lum v. Mission Inn Foundation Inc. Lum v. Mission Inn Foundation Inc.
1986
Mead Reinsurance Co. v. Superior Court of Riverside County Mead Reinsurance Co. v. Superior Court of Riverside County
1986
Mcgee v. Superior Court of Riverside County Mcgee v. Superior Court of Riverside County
1985
Sunrise Country Club Association Inc. v. Proud Sunrise Country Club Association Inc. v. Proud
1987
Inland Counties Regional Center Inc. v. Office of Administrative Hearings Inland Counties Regional Center Inc. v. Office of Administrative Hearings
1987