Aguilera v. Inservices Aguilera v. Inservices

Aguilera v. Inservices

905 SO.2D 84, 30 FLA. L. WEEKLY S440, 2005.FL.0002792

    • 5,00 kr
    • 5,00 kr

Utgivarens beskrivning

We have for review Inservices, Inc. v. Aguilera, 837 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), which expressly and directly conflicts with and also misapplies our decision in Sibley v. Adjustco, Inc., 596 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 1992). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; see also Knowles v. State, 848 So. 2d 1055, 1056 (Fla. 2003) (accepting jurisdiction based on conflict created by misapplication of decisional law); Robertson v. State, 829 So. 2d 901, 904 (Fla. 2002) (stating that misapplication of decisional law creates conflict jurisdiction); Acensio v. State, 497 So. 2d 640, 641 (Fla. 1986) (accepting jurisdiction based on conflict created by misapplication of decisional law). We disapprove the decision under review for the reasons provided in our analysis below.

GENRE
Yrkesrelaterat och teknik
UTGIVEN
2005
16 juni
SPRÅK
EN
Engelska
LÄNGD
57
Sidor
UTGIVARE
LawApp Publishers
STORLEK
80,7
KB

Fler böcker av Supreme Court of Illinois

Electro-Motive Div. v. Indus. Com. Electro-Motive Div. v. Indus. Com.
1952
County of Du Page v. Graham County of Du Page v. Graham
1985
Chicago Park Dist. v. Downey Coal Co. Chicago Park Dist. v. Downey Coal Co.
1953
Halpin v. Scotti Halpin v. Scotti
1953
The People v. Moretti The People v. Moretti
1953
Jarrett v. Jarrett Jarrett v. Jarrett
1953