Baker v. Grice. Baker v. Grice.

Baker v. Grice‪.‬

18 S. CT. 323, 169 U.S. 284, 42 L. ED. 748, 1898.SCT.40042

    • 5,00 kr
    • 5,00 kr

Utgivarens beskrivning

The court below had jurisdiction to issue the writ and to decide the questions which were argued before it. Ex parte Royall, 117 U.S. 241; Whitten v. Tomlinson, 160 U.S. 231. In the latter case most of the prior authorities are mentioned. From these cases it clearly appears, as the settled and proper procedure, that while Circuit Courts of the United States have jurisdiction, under the circumstances set forth in the foregoing statement, to issue the writ of habeas corpus, yet those courts ought not to exercise that jurisdiction by the discharge of a prisoner unless in cases of peculiar urgency, and that instead of discharging they will leave the prisoner to be dealt with by the courts of the State; that after a final determination of the case by the state court, the Federal courts will even then generally leave the petitioner to his remedy by writ of habeas corpus

GENRE
Yrkesrelaterat och teknik
UTGIVEN
1898
21 februari
SPRÅK
EN
Engelska
LÄNGD
7
Sidor
UTGIVARE
LawApp Publishers
STORLEK
53,1
KB

Fler böcker av Supreme Court of the United States

Woods v. Texas Bell v. Texas Brooks v. Texas Green v. Texas Demouchette v. Texas and Barefoot v. Texas Woods v. Texas Bell v. Texas Brooks v. Texas Green v. Texas Demouchette v. Texas and Barefoot v. Texas
1981
Cream Wheat Company v. County Grand Forks Cream Wheat Company v. County Grand Forks
1920
Roe Et Al. v. Wade Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
National Hockey League Et Al. v. Metropolitan Hockey Club National Hockey League Et Al. v. Metropolitan Hockey Club
1976
Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company v. Sabine Tram Company. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company v. Sabine Tram Company.
1913
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3
2024