![Baker v. Tullock Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Baker v. Tullock Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Baker v. Tullock Et Al.
77 P.2D 1035, 106 MONT. 375, 1938.MT.0000027
-
- 5,00 kr
-
- 5,00 kr
Utgivarens beskrivning
Plaintiffs brought this action as administrators of the estate of Daniel C. Schaff, deceased, to recover damages for the death of the intestate, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. Following a trial before a jury, a verdict Page 359 was returned for the defendant and judgment entered thereon. From such judgment this appeal is brought by the plaintiffs who, by specifications, contend that the district court erred (1) in overruling and denying their motion for a new trial, (2) in refusing to give certain instructions proposed by the plaintiffs, (3) in giving certain specified instructions, and (4) in rendering judgment against the plaintiffs.