Barker v. Hull Barker v. Hull

Barker v. Hull

1987.CA.40762 191 CAL. APP. 3D 221; 236 CAL. RPTR. 285

    • 5,00 kr
    • 5,00 kr

Utgivarens beskrivning

James and Jacqueline McKeown appeal from summary judgment entered against them and in favor of respondent First Interstate Bank of California (First Interstate). That judgment was granted on the ground that appellants causes of action for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and negligence, were all barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. Appellants contend that the trial courts determination was in error based on their assertion that their causes of action against respondent did not accrue until appellants suffered "appreciable harm" as a result of the tax court decision.

GENRE
Yrkesrelaterat och teknik
UTGIVEN
1987
21 april
SPRÅK
EN
Engelska
LÄNGD
10
Sidor
UTGIVARE
LawApp Publishers
STORLEK
56,6
KB

Fler böcker av First Appellate District, Division One Court of Appeal of California

People v. Mccarthy People v. Mccarthy
1986
Vassallo v. Lowrey Vassallo v. Lowrey
1986
People v. Flint People v. Flint
1986
Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Fibreboard Corp. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Fibreboard Corp.
1986
Robertson v. Wentz Robertson v. Wentz
1986
Buckhart v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board Buckhart v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board
1988