![Barker v. James](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Barker v. James](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Barker v. James
486 P.2D 195, 15 ARIZ. APP. 83, 1971.AZ.40312
-
- 5,00 kr
-
- 5,00 kr
Utgivarens beskrivning
1. Whether § 44-1844, subsec. 3 A.R.S., which exempts a bona fide owner of shares of stock or securities from the registration requirements if he sells those stocks in an "isolated transaction" but does not exempt him if they are sold in "repeated or successive transactions of similar character," is void because of indefiniteness and vagueness.