Barker V. Shalala

Per Curiam. This is an appeal from a district court decision affirming a denial of social security disability benefits and supplemental security income. Asserting that the ruling was not supported by substantial evidence, the plaintiff contends that an administrative law Judge misconstrued evidence of a mental disability and admitted vocational evidence improperly. We do not find the plaintiff's contentions persuasive, and we shall affirm the judgment of the district court.