Barker v. Wingo
92 S. CT. 2182, 407 U.S. 514, 33 L. ED. 2D 101, 1972.SCT.42266
-
- 5,00 kr
-
- 5,00 kr
Utgivarens beskrivning
Although a speedy trial is guaranteed the accused by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, this Court has dealt with that right on infrequent occasions. See Beavers v. Haubert, 198 U.S. 77 (1905); Pollard v. United States, 352 U.S. 354 (1957); United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 (1966); United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307 (1971). See also United States v. Provoo, 17 F.R.D. 183 (D. Md.), affd, 350 U.S. 857 (1955). The Courts opinion in Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967), established that the right to a speedy trial is "fundamental" and is imposed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment on the States. See Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374 (1969); Dickey v. Florida, 398 U.S. 30 (1970). As MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN
Fler böcker av Supreme Court of the United States
Woods v. Texas Bell v. Texas Brooks v. Texas Green v. Texas Demouchette v. Texas and Barefoot v. Texas
1981
Cream Wheat Company v. County Grand Forks
1920
Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
National Hockey League Et Al. v. Metropolitan Hockey Club
1976
Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company v. Sabine Tram Company.
1913
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3
2024