Barker v. Wingo Barker v. Wingo

Barker v. Wingo

92 S. CT. 2182, 407 U.S. 514, 33 L. ED. 2D 101, 1972.SCT.42266

    • 5,00 kr
    • 5,00 kr

Utgivarens beskrivning

Although a speedy trial is guaranteed the accused by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, this Court has dealt with that right on infrequent occasions. See Beavers v. Haubert, 198 U.S. 77 (1905); Pollard v. United States, 352 U.S. 354 (1957); United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 (1966); United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307 (1971). See also United States v. Provoo, 17 F.R.D. 183 (D. Md.), affd, 350 U.S. 857 (1955). The Courts opinion in Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967), established that the right to a speedy trial is "fundamental" and is imposed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment on the States. See Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374 (1969); Dickey v. Florida, 398 U.S. 30 (1970). As MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN

GENRE
Yrkesrelaterat och teknik
UTGIVEN
1972
22 juni
SPRÅK
EN
Engelska
LÄNGD
32
Sidor
UTGIVARE
LawApp Publishers
STORLEK
69,6
KB

Fler böcker av Supreme Court of the United States

Woods v. Texas Bell v. Texas Brooks v. Texas Green v. Texas Demouchette v. Texas and Barefoot v. Texas Woods v. Texas Bell v. Texas Brooks v. Texas Green v. Texas Demouchette v. Texas and Barefoot v. Texas
1981
Cream Wheat Company v. County Grand Forks Cream Wheat Company v. County Grand Forks
1920
Roe Et Al. v. Wade Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
National Hockey League Et Al. v. Metropolitan Hockey Club National Hockey League Et Al. v. Metropolitan Hockey Club
1976
Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company v. Sabine Tram Company. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company v. Sabine Tram Company.
1913
United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3 United States Code Annotated 2024 Edition Title 10 Armed Forces Volume 3/3
2024