Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz and Schatz Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz and Schatz

Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz and Schatz

247 CONN. 48, 717 A.2D 724, 1998.CT.0042822

    • 5,00 kr
    • 5,00 kr

Utgivarens beskrivning

The principal issue in this appeal is the proper method for calculating damages for the destruction of a nascent business. We conclude that: (1) unestablished enterprises must be permitted to recover damages for legal malpractice and that a flexible approach in determining those damages generally is appropriate; (2) lost profits for a reasonable period of time may serve as an appropriate measure of damages under certain circumstances; and (3) the plaintiff bears the burden of proving lost profits to a reasonable certainty. As applied to the facts of this case, however, we conclude that the plaintiff has not sustained its burden of proof regarding damages.

GENRE
Yrkesrelaterat och teknik
UTGIVEN
1998
4 juni
SPRÅK
EN
Engelska
LÄNGD
55
Sidor
UTGIVARE
LawApp Publishers
STORLEK
91,8
KB

Fler böcker av Supreme Court of Connecticut

Chro v. Truelove and Maclean Chro v. Truelove and Maclean
1996
Community Credit Union, Inc. v. Connors Community Credit Union, Inc. v. Connors
1954
Sullivan v. Sullivan Sullivan v. Sullivan
1954
Board of Education v. Board of Labor Relations Board of Education v. Board of Labor Relations
1986
Stratford v. Local 134 Ifpte Stratford v. Local 134 Ifpte
1986
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Ferrante Allstate Ins. Co. v. Ferrante
1986