Kamen v. Gray Kamen v. Gray

Kamen v. Gray

169 Kan. 664, 220 P.2d 160, KS.0042147(1950)

    • 5,00 kr
    • 5,00 kr

Utgivarens beskrivning

The opinion of the court was delivered by This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. Lee Kamen, Petitioner, seeks to be discharged from the custody of respondent sheriff, by whom he is detained awaiting trial on a criminal charge. He claims that his imprisonment is unlawful and that he is being deprived of his liberty in violation of federal and state constitutions and laws. The following proceedings were had in the district court of Sedgwick county, prior to institution of these proceedings in habeas corpus. Petitioner, defendant below, was after a preliminary hearing before the city court of Wichita on May 9, 1949 on January 16, 1950, placed on trial before a jury in the district court of Sedgwick county on a charge of receiving stolen property, having waived arraignment and pleaded not guilty. The state introduced evidence of seven witnesses the seventh being Detective Reeves of the police department concerning a police report and alleged changes in the report, which report was offered in evidence and, over defendant's objections, admitted and read to the jury. Defendant again objected to admission of said report and asked the court to declare a mistrial because of prejudice to defendant by its erroneous admission, but was overruled by the court. The state then rested its case and the court called for introduction of the case for the defense, whereupon counsel for the defense asked that the jury be excused while he argued some motions to the court. Before the jury was excused, counsel for the state explained for the record and to the jury the purpose for which the police report in controversy was offered in evidence. The jury having been excused, counsel for defendant moved for a directed verdict of not guilty and discharge of defendant for the reason the state had failed to prove the allegations and averments alleged in the second amended information, which motion was argued by counsel and taken under advisement by the court. Court was recessed, and on reconvening, argument on the motion to dismiss continued for some time, whereupon the

GENRE
Yrkesrelaterat och teknik
UTGIVEN
1950
8 juli
SPRÅK
EN
Engelska
LÄNGD
9
Sidor
UTGIVARE
LawApp Publishers
STORLEK
51,5
KB

Fler böcker av Supreme Court of Kansas

Kpers v. Reimer & Koger Assocs Kpers v. Reimer & Koger Assocs
1996
In re Care & Treatment of Hendricks In re Care & Treatment of Hendricks
1996
Gillespie v. Seymour Gillespie v. Seymour
1991
Bair v. Peck Bair v. Peck
1991
Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons
1975
Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n
1986