Kidd v. Early Kidd v. Early

Kidd v. Early

1976.NC.41199 289 N.C. 343; 222 S.E.2D 392

    • 5,00 kr
    • 5,00 kr

Utgivarens beskrivning

It is axiomatic that an opinion and award entered by the Industrial Commission may not be disturbed on appeal unless a patent error of law exists therein. See G.S. 97-86; Godley v. County of Pitt, and cases there cited, 306 N.C. 357, 293 S.E.2d 807 (1982). In the instant case, our review is directed toward the resolution of a single issue: whether the Commission erred as a matter of law in finding and concluding that plaintiffs injury arose out of and occurred in the course of his employment as a truck driver for defendant. We disagree with the Court of Appeals and hold that, on these particular facts, the employee-driver and owner-lessor of the truck is entitled to workers compensation for the accidental injury sustained by him.

GENRE
Yrkesrelaterat och teknik
UTGIVEN
1976
2 mars
SPRÅK
EN
Engelska
LÄNGD
36
Sidor
UTGIVARE
LawApp Publishers
STORLEK
65,9
KB

Fler böcker av Supreme Court of North Carolina

Maola Ice Cream Co. V. Milk Maola Ice Cream Co. V. Milk
1953
Branham v. Roll Branham v. Roll
1943
North Carolina v. Lawson North Carolina v. Lawson
1994
In re Appeal of Cone Mills Corp. In re Appeal of Cone Mills Corp.
1994
Lohr v. Lohr Lohr v. Lohr
1994
Pinnix v. City of High Point Pinnix v. City of High Point
1994