Laboratory Sanctions for Proficiency Testing Sample Referral and Result Communication: A Review of Actions from 1993-2006 (Report) Laboratory Sanctions for Proficiency Testing Sample Referral and Result Communication: A Review of Actions from 1993-2006 (Report)

Laboratory Sanctions for Proficiency Testing Sample Referral and Result Communication: A Review of Actions from 1993-2006 (Report‪)‬

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 2009, June, 133, 6

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Publisher Description

Participation in approved external proficiency testing (PT) programs is required for clinical laboratories that hold certificates for nonwaived testing under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) regulations (42 CFR, pt 493). Laboratories are required to enroll in these programs for all analytes listed in subpart I of the regulations (the "regulated" analytes). If a laboratory is testing analytes for which no PT program exists, it must verify the accuracy of its results by other approved methods at least twice a year. Some accrediting organizations require that laboratories participate in approved PT programs that cover both the regulated analytes and certain additional non-regulated analytes. Proficiency testing is widely regarded as an important measure of a laboratory's performance and was considered in a 1988 Congressional report to be "arguably the most important measure, since it reviews actual test results rather than merely gauging the potential for good results." (1) Under the CLIA implementing law (42 USC 263a) and its regulations, PT is one of the most extensively regulated aspects of laboratory practice. Existing requirements demand that PT samples be examined or tested with the laboratory's regular patient workload by personnel who routinely perform the testing in the laboratory and by using the laboratory's routine methods ([section]493.801[b]2). There must be no communication of PT results between laboratories (even if owned by the same organization) before the deadline for submission of results to the PT program ([section]493.801[b]3). In addition, a laboratory must not refer a PT sample to another laboratory for testing if it is certified to perform such testing itself ([section]493.801[b]4).

GENRE
Health & Well-Being
RELEASED
2009
1 June
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
College of American Pathologists
SIZE
229.4
KB

More Books by Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine

Unsatisfactory Reporting Rates: 2006 Practices of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Gynecologic Cytology (Cap Laboratory Improvement Programs) (Survey) Unsatisfactory Reporting Rates: 2006 Practices of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Gynecologic Cytology (Cap Laboratory Improvement Programs) (Survey)
2009
Bernard-Soulier Syndrome: An Inherited Platelet Disorder (Report) Bernard-Soulier Syndrome: An Inherited Platelet Disorder (Report)
2007
Poorly Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Associated with X-Linked Hyperimmunoglobulin M Syndrome (Case Report) (Disease/Disorder Overview) Poorly Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Associated with X-Linked Hyperimmunoglobulin M Syndrome (Case Report) (Disease/Disorder Overview)
2008
The Evolving Revolution of Pathology's Role in Renal Medical Diseases (Special Section--Renal Pathology) (Report) The Evolving Revolution of Pathology's Role in Renal Medical Diseases (Special Section--Renal Pathology) (Report)
2009
The Value of Monitoring Human Papillomavirus DNA Results for Papanicolaou Tests Diagnosed As Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 68 Institutions (Report) The Value of Monitoring Human Papillomavirus DNA Results for Papanicolaou Tests Diagnosed As Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 68 Institutions (Report)
2007
Laboratory Compliance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guidelines for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing: A College of American Pathologists Survey of 757 Laboratories (Cap Laboratory Improvement Programs) Laboratory Compliance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guidelines for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing: A College of American Pathologists Survey of 757 Laboratories (Cap Laboratory Improvement Programs)
2010